Position the destination.
Productize the wedge.
Roadmap the rest.
Every entry on this page is public, dated, and dependency-mapped. Every entry is paired with an explicit counterpart for what we will not commit to inside the same band. Reviewed at the close of each calendar quarter. Off-cycle updates when a committed item changes status by more than one band.
The four horizons.
Now, Next, Building, Series A. Each entry names the product, the status, what we commit to inside the band, and what we explicitly do not.
Quantum Audit CLI
A paid diagnostic that runs on-prem inside Fortune 500 HPC infrastructure. Classifies workloads against the 15-archetype library, returns a per-workload Quantum Suitability Score and a board-ready PDF in 14 days from kickoff to delivery.
- $40,000 single SKU for the first ten engagements
- Slurm, Kubernetes (stock + Argo Workflows), and PBS Pro scheduler support
- Methodology PDF v1.0, built for credentialed-advisor sign-off
- On-prem CLI distribution: PyInstaller binary and Docker image
- Two-week delivery window from kickoff to PDF
- LSF scheduler support (v1.1, post the first five paid audits)
- Custom archetype development inside the $40K SKU
- On-site delivery (remote engagement only in v1)
- Speedup multiplier claims tied to any specific QPU vendor
Q-Intercept Latency Index
The first quarterly benchmark tracking dollar cost of inefficient quantum-classical handoffs at Fortune 500 HPC centers. Methodology public. Customer manifest sanitization required. No customer ever named in the published edition.
- Inaugural report sourced from the first 5 to 10 paid audits (original Q2 2026 target slipped — see register)
- Sanitization layer: archetype counters and cost-band aggregates only
- Customer-typed consent flag before any manifest is uploaded
- Methodology hash printed on every published edition
- Advisory council seating completed before publication
- Customer-specific peer comparisons (peer bands only)
- Vendor performance comparisons across IBM, IonQ, neutral-atom
- Quarter-week precision in published horizons
- Sponsored entries or vendor co-marketing
Quantum-Aware Scheduler
A second-level scheduler that sits on top of Slurm, Kubernetes, and PBS Pro and routes hybrid workloads using calibration-aware logic. Beta-only, design-partner scope, no public SLA.
- Beta with one or two enterprise design partners (original Q3 2026 target shifted with the audit gate — see register)
- Read-only integration mode: no impact on existing scheduling decisions
- Public design notes published before beta launch
- General-availability date (Series A scoped)
- Production SLA
- Stable hetjob API
- Multi-tenant routing across customer fleets
Hardware Virtualization Layer
Vendor-neutral error mitigation across competing QPU clouds. This layer is the destination, not a current commitment. We will not commit a delivery date until the funding round closes.
- Public design notes published during 2026
- No vendor lock-in (hardware-agnostic by design)
- Open API surface for the routing brain
- Q-quarter precision before the Series A round closes
- Specific QPU vendor priority order
- Production fault-tolerance dates
- Any timeline that depends on hardware we do not manufacture
What we will not ship.
Every industry roadmap promises these. We do not. If you are reading this page to confirm that we are not pitching them, you are reading correctly.
Quantum Internet
Fault-tolerant quantum computing dates
Algorithm Marketplace
Generic "Quantum ML" claims
Vendor-locked error correction layers
Speedup multipliers on today’s NISQ-era hardware
The commitment register.
Public log of every commitment recorded on this page. Reviewed at the close of each calendar quarter and stamped into the methodology archive.
| Date committed | Commitment | Current status |
|---|---|---|
| 2026-01-15 | Audit CLI GA target Q1 2026 | On track |
| 2026-02-01 | Latency Index inaugural target Q2 2026 | Pending 5+ audits |
| 2026-03-12 | Quantum-Aware Scheduler beta target Q3 2026 | In design |
| 2026-04-08 | Methodology PDF v1.0 publication | Pending advisor signature |
| 2026-05-20 | First wave of design-partner audits begin | Outreach scheduled |
| 2026-07-09 | Advisor signature target moved from 2026-06-15 to 2026-08-01 | Slipped in public; methodology in deep technical peer review, signature pending |
| 2026-08-04 | Advisor signature: revised 2026-08-01 target also passed | Second slip logged. Now event-gated: no new date; publishes when the review concludes |
| 2026-08-07 | Q3 quarterly review: Audit CLI Q1 2026 GA band passed | Re-banded. The v0.0.2 binary is built, GPG-signed, and delivered to engaged customers in production; the GA label is withheld until advisor sign-off — event-gated with the signature |
| 2026-08-07 | Latency Index inaugural edition: Q2 2026 target slipped | Gate fired — no paid audits closed. Event-gated: publishes the quarter after the first five paid audits close; no replacement date |
| 2026-08-07 | Quantum-Aware Scheduler beta: Q3 2026 → Q4 2026 at earliest | Shifted per the standing audit-volume dependency; moves into Series A scope if audit volume stalls |
| 2026-08-10 | CORRECTION: no advisor engagement ever existed | The "deep technical peer review" status logged 2026-07-09 through 2026-08-04 was false. The advisor identity in our internal records was fabricated during AI-assisted documentation work and failed verification; there was no advisor and no review. We found the error ourselves and are publishing it, per this register’s rules. Advisor recruitment restarted from zero; sign-off by a real, named, credentialed advisor remains the gate for GA and methodology publication |
| 2026-08-11 | CORRECTION: /security overclaimed Docker distribution | The security whitepaper claimed cosign-signed Docker images with SLSA level 3 provenance. Neither exists; distribution is the GPG-signed binary (fingerprint now published on /security). The Docker path stays on the roadmap and ships only with equivalent signature guarantees |
| 2026-08-11 | Design-partner cohort ships without an advisor signature (ADR-0018) | Amends the published rule that we decline any engagement without a named advisor. A first cohort ships under design-partner terms with the absence disclosed in writing before contracting, and those reports are re-signed at no charge on methodology publication. The standard $40,000 SKU stays gated on a seated advisor; no artifact describes the methodology as advisor-signed until it is |
What changes the roadmap.
The conditions under which we accelerate, slip, or rescope. Disclosed in advance, logged when triggered.
If the advisor signature publishes and the first five paid audits close within a quarter
The Latency Index inaugural edition ships the following quarter. The methodology hash increments to mark the change.
If audit volume stalls through the remainder of 2026
The Scheduler beta moves into Series A scope and the Latency Index remains event-gated. Both moves are logged in the register the day they are decided.
If hardware fidelity sustains above 99.5% on benchmark gates through 2027
Series A scope and timeline are re-evaluated. The Hardware Virtualization Layer may accelerate by one quarter.
If the technical advisor changes mid-engagement
The methodology PDF version increments. Existing audit reports are re-signed by the new advisor at no charge to the customer.
Update cadence
Quarterly review at the close of each calendar quarter. Off-cycle updates published when a committed item’s status changes by more than one band, or when a documented dependency materially changes. Every update carries a methodology hash and is prepared for advisor sign-off.